Skip to main content
mobile

Heritázs

  • Search
  • Collections
Englishen
  • Magyarhu
  • Српскиsr
  • Serbo-Croatiansh
LoginRegister
  • Volume Overview
  • Page
  • Text
  • Metadata
  • Clipping
Preview
srb_000007/0000

Charisma - J_Dyer_G_Verri_and_J_Cupitt_Multispectral

  • Preview
  • Show Metadata
  • Show Permalink
Total Pages
192
Collection
Presentations of MSI conference in Serbia
srb_000007/0017
  • Volume Overview
  • Page
  • Text
  • Metadata
  • Clipping
Page 18 [18]
  • Preview
  • Show Permalink
  • JPG
  • TIFF
  • Prev
  • Next
srb_000007/0017

OCR

i. Reflected images The factors affecting reproducibility and device dependence of reflected images are discussed in the sections below. Three main effects are considered: 1) Spatial inhomogeneities of the radiation source; 2) Spectral density of the radiation source and non-linear camera response; 3) Camera response (colour calibration for visible-reflected images only). In addition, the need for image registration of the various reflected images in order to produce false-colour images is discussed. — Spatial inhomogeneities of the radiation source The spatial distribution of radiation reflected from objects and captured by a camera depends, among other factors, on the position of the radiation source(s) and the geometry of the object. Non-uniform illumination can lead to spatial inhomogeneities introduced by the illumination system. Figure 1-6(a) and (c) show two images of a uniformly reflective board taken under different illumination conditions: Visible and UV illumination, respectively. Although these images look relatively uniform, it is clear from the enhanced contrast images (iso-grey level values) shown in Figure 1-6(b) and (d) that the distribution of incident radiation in each case is very uneven. Visible-IR illumination UV illumination WB visible: Enhanced WB UV Enhanced min RGB = 126 contrast Min RGB = 160 contrast max RGB = 198 max RGB = 231 A= 28% A= 28% Figure 1-6. Images of a uniformly reflective board taken under different illumination conditions: (a) Visible and (c) UV illumination. Images (b) and (d) are enhanced contrast images showing the isogrey levels corresponding to the distribution of incident visible light in (a) and UV radiation in (b) on the surface under investigation. " An example of the impact of non-uniform illumination on the resultant reflected image is shown in Figure 1-7(a), where the upper section of a visible-reflected image appears to be Version No. 1.0 10 Date : 14/10/2013 NTH FRAMEWORK

Structural

Custom

Image Metadata

Image width
2481 px
Image height
3508 px
Image resolution
300 px/inch
Original File Size
1.22 MB
Permalink to jpg
srb_000007/0017.jpg
Permalink to ocr
srb_000007/0017.ocr

Privacy

  • Privacy policies
  • Cookies

  • https://facebook.com/tripont

Website

  • heritazs.hu
  • phaseone.hu
  • tripont.hu
  • tripont.hu/problog

Contact

  • +36 30 462 23 40
  • klinger.gabor@tripont.hu
  • 1131 Budapest,
  • Reitter Ferenc utca 132/J.

  • Copyright © 2023 Tripont Kft.
  • Copyright © 2024 Tripont Kft.

Heritázs

LoginRegister

User login

I forgot my password
  • Search
  • Collections
Englishen
  • Magyarhu
  • Српскиsr
  • Serbo-Croatiansh